Paul Woolford’s new track video is a nostalgic love letter to the golden age of rave, made to accompany the fittingly uptempo piano bomb ‘You Already Know’, offering Karen Harding on vocals.
The Leeds-primarily based producer is no stranger to celebrating halcyon days long gone by using, and has hired the offerings of director Joe Wilson— known for work with Bicep— to realize the comic, if bittersweet, tale of 1 lone dance disciple appearing out the ranges involved in getting geared up for, after which getting sweaty in, a warehouse birthday celebration.
The clip isn’t always the only issue of the tune that would inspire a nostalgic mind. ‘You Already Know’ is the four-hundredth launch to hit the legendary Positiva imprint, which set upkeep in 1993, turned 25 ultimate 12 months and has hosted the likes of Hyper Go-Go, Barbara Tucker, Kenny Dope, The Ragga Twins, Reel 2 Reel, Storm, and Paul Van Dyk through the years.
Woolford additionally currently launched a hoard of archive material beneath his a whole lot-lauded pirate radio-inspired Special Request guise, and in April introduced 4 new albums underneath the moniker.

Brett Gorvy, head of post-battle and contemporary art, stated “The superb bidding and record charges set to mirror a new era within the artwork marketplace,” he said. Steven Murphy, CEO of Christie’s International, said new creditors have been helping pressure the boom.
Myths of the Music-Fine Art Price Differential
When I came throughout this article I was taken aback on the prices those artworks had been able to achieve. Several of them could rarely evoke a wonderful emotional response in me, at the same time as others might simplest slightly, but for almost all of them I actually do not apprehend how their fees are contemplated in the work, and vice versa. Obviously, those portions have been not supposed for human beings like me, an artist, while rich shoppers virtually see their intrinsic inventive value clearly.
So why doesn’t song appeal to these forms of costs? Is it even viable for a piece of the recorded track, now not song memorabilia or a tune artifact (inclusive of an extraordinary file, LP, bootleg, T-shirt, album artwork, and so forth.), to be well worth $1 million or extra? Are all musicians and music composers doomed to conflict within the track industry and claw their way up into a profession in music? If one painting may be worth $1 million, why cannot a tune or piece of music also be valued similarly? Apparently, the $.99 in line with download price is the very best rate a track is able to command at marketplace price, regardless of what its pleasant or content material, and the musician or composer should take delivery of this fee as such.
The financial equation seems something like this:
1 portray = $37 million
1 song = $.99
Sometimes human beings say that a track can exchange the arena, but no person ever says that approximately artwork. So theoretically, if humans want alternate $.99 is the rate we should pay for it.
Now here are a few statements that must assist us to make clear what the economic or value discrepancy between painting and tune is based totally upon.
(1) There are fewer painters than there are musicians.
(2) Musicians are much less proficient than painters?

(3) It is simpler to create music than it’s miles to color.
(four) The public values paintings are greater than the tune.
(5) Paintings are more beautiful than track.
(6) Paintings are not possible to replicate, unlike tune.
(7) Painters paintings more difficult than musicians and composers.
(8) Blah, blah, blah.
Hardly all of us is of the same opinion with all of those statements and but all, or at the least, some of them, would ought to be true so as for the fee of paintings to so substantially exceed the cost of the track. Moreover, I doubt that art collectors and top-notch painters should deal with as much felony purple tape as do musicians when freeing their work into the general public area, so why are not the rewards equal, if now not greater for musicians who have to work nearly as a lot shielding their work as in producing it. Musicians and composers, however, simply need to do extra than authenticate their work and reap accurate appraisals regarding what their work is worth, but they get paid less. The equipment expenses by myself for musicians is a lot higher than it’s miles for painters.
Maybe it is reputation, and now not money, musicians are after? That could give an explanation for why most musicians accept the low pay they acquire from report offers and digital downloads. Perhaps, it is additionally why a lot of them are journeying more regularly to boom their reputation and no longer their fortunes. But wait a minute, it is in which musicians truly make the maximum of their money from live performances and the promoting of merchandise, however now not the song. I wager this is why many musicians see themselves now not as composers, but alternatively as performers and entertainers.

So what can musicians do, who don’t see themselves as entertainers, however as an alternative as composers who create a song as a high-quality art? Because they too have a sturdy choice to earn a dwelling to support themselves in their chosen career, therefore there should be a specialized method wherein they gift their paintings to music lovers or art creditors in search of assets and curators for precise pieces to the location in their personal galleries. Imagine that, a recorded piece of the song that few have ever heard which is displayed and played best on a specified tune participant in a personal art gallery or collection.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *